Comparison
SAST, DAST or manual code review?
Three ways to look for application flaws. Each sees things the others miss.
| SAST (static analysis) | DAST (dynamic analysis) | Manual review | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Looks at | Source code | The running app | Code and logic |
| Good at | Injection, secrets, risky patterns | Configuration, headers, exposed flaws | Access control, business logic |
| Weakness | False positives, no runtime view | Can’t see code or hidden parts | Needs expert time |
| Best moment | Every commit (CI) | Before release | On sensitive areas and before an audit |
Our approach
We automate what can be automated (SAST, dependencies, secrets in the pipeline) and focus human time where a mistake is expensive: authentication, authorization, payments, personal data. A penetration test then confirms what is truly exploitable.
Free tool
Open the calculator Take the cybersecurity self-assessment
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Are free tools enough?
They’re a good start in the pipeline, but they don’t understand your business logic or access rules.
Planning secure code review?
Describe your situation in a few lines; an engineer will call you back quickly. The site visit and quote are free.
Quote
Request a quote
Free, no obligation. A quick answer from an engineer, in English or French.
- Free site visit and quote
- An engineer, not a salesperson
- 15+ years’ experience, across Quebec
- Hardware stocked on altea.io
Updated 2026-11-05